BARACKMAN v. ANDERSON

(CC 9908-08315; CA A112472; SC S51462).

109 P.3d 370 (2005)

338 Or. 365

Deanna BARACKMAN, Petitioner on Review, v. Anthony ANDERSON, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided March 31, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williard E. Merkel, of Merkel & Associates, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Thomas Christ, of Cosgrave, Vergeer & Kester LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondent on review.

Meagan A. Flynn, Portland, filed briefs on behalf of amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.


De MUNIZ, J.

The issue in this case is whether a decision in a personal injury protection (PIP) arbitration should be given preclusive effect in a subsequent civil action.1 Plaintiff claimed dental injuries arising out of a vehicle collision and sought PIP benefits from her own insurer. An arbitration panel concluded that the collision did not cause plaintiff's dental injuries.

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases