1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 407 F.Supp.2d
  5. 407 F.Supp.2d 70 (2005)
 

JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. FOOD & DRUG ADMIN.

No. Civ.A. 00-2973(RJL).

407 F.Supp.2d 70 (2005)

JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, Defendant, and The Population Council, Inc., and Danco Laboratories, LLC., Defendant-Intervenors.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

April 27, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry Elliot Klayman, James F. Peterson, Meredith Leigh Cavallo, Paul J. Orfanedes, Judicial Watch, Incorporated, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Edith M. Shine, Fred Elmore Haynes, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

Kate Cumming Beardsley, Nancy Lillian Buc, Carmen Mercedes Shepard, Buc & Beardsley, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Intervenors.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEON, District Judge.

Judicial Watch brought this action because the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") had failed to substantially respond to its October 18, 2000 Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") request seeking information regarding the abortion drug mifepristone (also referred to as Mifeprex or RU-486). On July 18, 2001, Judge Lambreth granted FDA's motion to stay the proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases