1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 365 S.C.
  5. 365 S.C. 112 (2005)
 

BOWMAN v. STATE ROOFING CO.

No. 25996.

365 S.C. 112 (2005)

616 S.E.2d 699

Bryan BOWMAN, Claimant, v. STATE ROOFING COMPANY, Chesterfield County School District, George Cantlon, Uninsured Employers' Fund, Travelers Insurance Co., AFCO Credit Corporation, and C. Douglas Wilson & Co. Inc., Of whom State Roofing Company and Uninsured Employers' Fund are Respondents, and Travelers Insurance Co. and AFCO Credit Corporation are, Appellants. Danny Gainey, Claimant, v. State Roofing Company, Chesterfield County School District, George Cantlon, Uninsured Employers' Fund, Travelers Insurance Co., AFCO Credit Corporation, and C. Douglas Wilson & Co. Inc., Of whom State Roofing Company and Uninsured Employers' Fund are Respondents, and Travelers Insurance Co. and AFCO Credit Corporation are, Appellants.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided June 6, 2005.

Refiled July 18, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Mitchell Brown, Elizabeth Herlong Campbell, and Beth Burke Richardson, of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, L.L.P., of Columbia; and Erroll Anne Y. Hodges, of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, L.L.P., of Greenville, for appellant AFCO Credit Corporation.

Byron P. Roberts, of Tally, Roberts & Blue, L.L.C., of Columbia, for appellant Travelers Insurance Co.

David C. Holler, of Lee, Erter, Wilson, James, Holler & Smith, L.L.C., of Sumter, for respondent Employer Company.

Ajerenal Danley and Matthew C. Robertson, of Danley Law Firm, P.C., of Columbia, for respondent Uninsured Employers' Fund.

Justice MOORE:

Claimants Bowman and Gainey commenced these workers' compensation claims alleging on-the-job injuries sustained on June 3 and September 15, 1998, while working for respondent State Roofing Company (Employer). Employer's workers' compensation insurance carrier, appellant Travelers Insurance Company (Carrier), denied coverage on both claims asserting Employer's policy had been cancelled effective before either claim arose. The two claims came before the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases