Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellants' contention, the plaintiff's submissions in opposition to the motion to quash the subpoenas, and in support of the plaintiff's cross motion to compel depositions, sufficiently demonstrated that the witnesses produced by the defendants did not possess sufficient knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the challenged zoning amendment, and that such information was material and necessary in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.