1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 16 A.D.3d
  5. 16 A.D.3d 447 (2005)
 

BOOS v. BEDROCK MATERIALS, INC.

16 A.D.3d 447 (2005)

791 N.Y.S.2d 621

HALA BOOS et al., Appellants, v. BEDROCK MATERIALS, INC., et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 14, 2005.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

"It is axiomatic that a driver is not required to anticipate that an automobile traveling in the opposite direction will cross over into oncoming traffic" (Koch v Levenson, 225 A.D.2d 592, 592-593 [1996]). Such a scenario presents an emergency situation, and the actions of the driver faced with such a situation must be judged in that context (see Koch v Levenson, supra

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases