The IAS court properly exercised its discretion in directing that the child's custodial accounts, which were originally funded by a close friend of the father with the mother as custodian, be used by the mother to pay the son's college expenses and exhausted before the parties pay such expenses themselves (Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c] [7]; see Otero v Otero,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MITNICK v. ROSENTHAL
14 A.D.3d 440 (2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 12
ROBIN MITNICK, M.D., Appellant, v. JESSE ROSENTHAL, M.D., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 25, 2005.
January 25, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
