Plaintiffs' claims in quasi-contract, based on alleged violations of former section 396-z of the General Business Law, were properly dismissed. That law provided the Attorney General with broad enforcement powers (§ 396-z [12] [b], [c], [d]). A private cause of action may not be fairly implied where the Legislature has provided "a potent official enforcement mechanism" (Matter of Carrube v New York City Tr. Auth.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GOLDBERG v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR CO.
14 A.D.3d 417 (2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 114
MICAH GOLDBERG et al., Appellants, v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 20, 2005.
January 20, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
