1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 367 F.Supp.2d
  5. 367 F.Supp.2d 61 (2005)
 

BRINE, INC. v. STX, L.L.C.

Civ.A. No. 99-40167-NMG.

367 F.Supp.2d 61 (2005)

BRINE, INC., Plaintiff, v. STX, L.L.C., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

March 31, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Artz, Artz & Artz, Southfield, MI, for Warrior Lacrosse, Inc., Defendant.

John T. Bennett, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, for STX, Inc., Defendant.

Daniel Gordon Cromack, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, for STX, Inc., Defendant.

Brian M. Dingman, Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP, Westborough, MA, for Brine, Inc., Sports Licensing, Inc., Counter Defendant.

Douglas C. Doskocil, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, for STX, Inc., Counter Claimant.

Lucy Fowler, Foley Hoag LLP, Boston, MA, for Sports Licensing, Inc., Plaintiff.

Jenifer E. Haeckl, Mirick & O'Connell, Westborough, MA, for Brine, Inc., Counter Defendant.

Eileen M. Herlihy, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, for STX, Inc., Counter Claimant.

Erin D.E. Jofre, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, for STX, Inc., Defendant.

Ralph A. Loren, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, for STX, LLC, Defendant.

Peter D. McDermott, Banner & Witcoff, LTD, Boston, MA, for Warrior Lacrosse, Inc., Defendant.

John O. Mirick, Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, Worcester, for Brine, Inc., Plaintiff.

Kenneth W. Salinger, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, for STX, Inc., Defendant.

Lindsey M. Straus, Law Office of Lindsey M. Straus, Brewster, for Brine, Inc., Sports Licensing, Inc., Plaintiffs.

Philip C. Swain, Foley Hoag LLP, Boston, MA, for Sports Licensing, Inc., Plaintiff.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

In the instant dispute, Brine, Inc. ("Brine") asserts that STX, L.L.C. ("STX") violated a permanent injunction entered by this Court following a jury verdict in Brine's favor. Brine alleges that STX continues to infringe Brine's patent on a lacrosse stick design. Presently before the Court is Brine's "Verified Complaint for Contempt" (Docket No. 312) through which Brine seeks to recover damages arising from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases