GAFFNEY v. BFP 300 MADISON II, LLC.


18 A.D.3d 403 (2005)

795 N.Y.S.2d 579

JOSEPH GAFFNEY et al., Respondents, v. BFP 300 MADISON II, LLC, et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 31, 2005.


The court providently exercised discretion in considering the summary judgment motion, notwithstanding its untimeliness. Plaintiffs demonstrated "good cause" by explaining that the delay was due, in part, to defendant Turner's failure to produce a witness for deposition in a timely fashion prior to the filing of note of issue, and by the delay in obtaining a transcript of said deposition (see Kunz v Gleeson, 9 A.D.3d 480 [2004])...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases