1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 18 A.D.3d
  5. 18 A.D.3d 402 (2005)
 

MILISTAR (NY) INC. v. NATASHA DIAMOND JEWELRY MANUFACTURERS

18 A.D.3d 402 (2005)

797 N.Y.S.2d 10

MILISTAR (NY) INC., Respondent, v. NATASHA DIAMOND JEWELRY MANUFACTURERS, LLC, et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 31, 2005.

Defendant Hershko's affidavit, offering only bald allegations of oral protest to plaintiff's invoices, was insufficient to defeat plaintiff's entitlement to summary judgment on an account stated, and the documentary evidence failed to substantiate defendants' claim that the invoices did not accurately set forth credits to which defendants were entitled (Manhattan Telecom. Corp. v Best Payphones, 299 A.D.2d 178 [2002]). As to Hershko...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases