1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 16 A.D.3d
  5. 16 A.D.3d 403 (2005)
 

STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. COAKLEY

16 A.D.3d 403 (2005)

790 N.Y.S.2d 412

STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Respondent, v. DORTHA COAKLEY et al., Defendants, and DONALD MacPHERSON, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 7, 2005.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

"It is well established that CPLR 308 (5) vests a court with the discretion to direct an alternative method of service of process when it has determined that the methods set forth in CPLR 308 (1), (2) and (4) are `impracticable'" (Home Fed. Sav. Bank v Versace, 252 A.D.2d 480 [1998], quoting CPLR 308 [5]). "Although the impracticability standard `is not capable of easy definition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases