The IAS court erred in not granting plaintiff's motion without exception, since the evidence submitted by both parties demonstrated that Gyamfi was negligent as a matter of law in backing up the vehicle into plaintiff pedestrian without taking adequate precautions (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1211 [a]). Defendants' assertion that an issue of fact was raised as to plaintiff's comparative negligence is speculative and unsupported...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.