Gary J. HOWELL, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Orrin DENOMIE and Helen Denomie, Defendants-Appellants-Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Oral argument April 28, 2005.
Decided June 22, 2005.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the defendants-appellants-petitioners there were briefs by Robert E. Haney, Alvin R. Ugent and Podell, Ugent & Haney, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Robert E. Haney.
For the plaintiff-respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Robert C. Longwell, Jr., Galesville.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by G. Michael Halfenger and Foley & Lardner, LLP, Milwaukee; and Jeffery O. Davis, and Quarles & Brady, LLP, Milwaukee, on behalf of the Appellate Practice Section, State Bar of Wisconsin, and there was oral argument by G. Michael Halfenger.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
¶ 1. PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J.
Orrin and Helen Denomie seek review of an unpublished court of appeals summary order1 affirming a circuit court judgment finding the Denomies' answer and counterclaim frivolous and awarding Gary Howell attorney fees. The Denomies also seek review of the court of appeals conclusion that their appeal was frivolous. We conclude that the circuit court correctly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
