1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 14 A.D.3d
  5. 14 A.D.3d 395 (2005)
 

MELNITZKY v. BESOBRASOW

14 A.D.3d 395 (2005)

787 N.Y.S.2d 655

MICHAEL MELNITZKY, Appellant, v. ELIZABETH BESOBRASOW, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 18, 2005.

All issues and claims raised herein that were or could have been addressed in plaintiff's matrimonial action, particularly regarding the inventory of the safe deposit boxes, are barred, even if based on different theories or sought under a different remedy (see Ryan v New York Tel. Co., 62 N.Y.2d 494 [1984]). Further, the claims of conversion, theft, damage to property, fraud, abuse of process, willful concealment and destruction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases