J.A.O. ACQUISITION CORP. v. STAVITSKY


18 A.D.3d 389 (2005)

795 N.Y.S.2d 569

J.A.O. ACQUISITION CORP. et al., Respondents, v. JEFFREY D. STAVITSKY, et al., Defendants, and W. PAUL BROGOWSKI, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 31, 2005.


Plaintiffs J.A.O. Acquisition Corp., J.A.O. Holding Company, Inc. (collectively referred to as JAO) and D.B. Brown, Inc., in their eighteenth cause of action contained in JAO's second amended complaint, contend that defendant W. Paul Brogowski (Brogowski) told JAO prior to the sale of D.B. Brown to JAO that certain foreign receivables were backed by letters of credit. Furthermore, JAO alleges that Brogowski inflated the value of D.B. Brown to induce JAO to purchase D.B. Brown...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases