CONSTANTINE v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT.

03-AB-2358; A123474.

117 P.3d 279 (2005)

200 Or. App. 677

Tara L. CONSTANTINE, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Money Tree Software, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 27, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julia Olsen, Hillsboro, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Legal Aid Services of Oregon.

Richard D. Wasserman, Salem, waived appearance for respondent Employment Department.

No appearance for respondent Money Tree Software.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and DEITS, Judge pro tempore.


ARMSTRONG, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board denying unemployment benefits. Claimant assigns error to the board's conclusion that she voluntarily left work before pursuing all reasonable alternatives. We review the board's conclusion for substantial evidence, substantial reason, and errors of law, ORS 183.482(8), and reverse and remand.

We state the pertinent facts found by the board. Claimant worked for Money Tree Software...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases