The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility. Appellant's course of conduct before, during and after the robbery was inconsistent with that of a mere bystander and established his accessorial liability. Appellant was part of a group that surrounded the victims, who were pushed up against a fence. Appellant remained in very close...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
