STATE v. HIETT

No. 75499-3.

115 P.3d 274 (2005)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Ferguson HIETT, Petitioner. State of Washington, Respondent, v. Ian Freilinger, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided June 30, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy P. Collins, Washington Appellate Project, Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, for Petitioners.

E. Bradford Bales, Carla Barbieri Carlstrom, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Seattle, for Respondent.


CHAMBERS, J.

¶ 1 Washington's juvenile restitution statute makes all participants convicted of a crime jointly and severally responsible for all restitution that must be paid because of the crime. The petitioners argue that, properly read, the statute is less broad and makes them jointly and severally responsible only for the damage they actually caused while committing the crime. Based on the plain language of the statute, we disagree and affirm the courts below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases