The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. In return for the free use of a locker, defendant, a resident of a homeless shelter, signed a contract expressly agreeing to keep the locker "in an orderly and sanitary condition," and also agreeing that the shelter, which maintained a master key, would have the unlimited right to inspect the locker. Defendant's eligibility for free lodging at the shelter was not conditioned on whether or not he chose to have a locker...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
