The undercover officer's testimony that she recognized defendant from a prior occasion did not constitute evidence of an uncharged crime. Although the officer provided a few details of the prior incident, some of which were elicited by defendant on cross-examination, there was no implication that the prior contact arose out of an arrest or any bad acts, and the testimony was material and relevant to the contested issue of defendant's identity as the seller (see People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
