1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 16 A.D.3d
  5. 16 A.D.3d 347 (2005)
 

IN THE MATTER OF URAM v. GARFINKEL

16 A.D.3d 347 (2005)

792 N.Y.S.2d 430

In the Matter of JACK URAM et al., Respondents, v. DAVID A. GARFINKEL, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 31, 2005.

It is uncontested that this securities arbitration is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act ([FAA] 9 USC § 1 et seq.), which embodies a strong "liberal federal policy favoring arbitration agreements," and provides for extremely limited judicial review of an arbitration award (Moses H. Cone Mem. Hosp. v Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 24 [1983]; Sawtelle v Waddell & Reed, 304 A.D.2d 103

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases