TAIN v. STATE BD. OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS

No. A106656.

30 Cal.Rptr.3d 330 (2005)

130 Cal.App.4th 609

Laurence TAIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

Rehearing Denied July 19, 2005.

Review Denied September 21, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Veritas Justice & Bioethics Institute, David Prescott and Hon. Edwin Grauke, Counsel for Appellants.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, James M. Humes, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Alfredo Terrazas, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Frank H. Pacoe, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Char Sachson, Deputy Attorney General, Counsel for Respondent.


RUVOLO, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Appellants Laurence Tain, Donald Nielsen, Robert Bitters, Stephanie Wattenberg, and Lori Prescott (appellants) hold degrees as doctors of chiropractic and are licensed to administer chiropractic treatment in California. Appellants appeal after the trial court dismissed their action against respondent State Board of Chiropractic Examiners (the Board) following the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases