1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 35 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 320 (2005)
 

BEHNIWAL v. MIX

No. G034074.

35 Cal.Rptr.3d 320 (2005)

133 Cal.App.4th 1027

Mandeep BEHNIWAL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Gene C. MIX et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

September 30, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Barry A. Ross and Barry A. Ross, Santa Ana, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Law Offices of Michael G. York and Michael G. York, Newport Beach, for Defendants and Respondents Gene and Jo Anne Mix.

Maxie Rheinheimer Stephens & Vrevich, Darin L. Wessel and Jane Rheinheimer, San Diego, for Defendants and Respondents Prudential California Reality and Kim Seidenberg.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

This is a statute of frauds case with attendant fallout involving attorney fees. It involves two appeals: one by the disappointed would-be buyers of an Irvine condo, Mandeep and Amandeep Behniwal, asserting that the trial court should have granted them specific performance; the other by the seller's agent and her realty company challenging attorney fees assessed against them at the conclusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases