JAMES v. CORWIN


19 A.D.3d 336 (2005)

797 N.Y.S.2d 498

D'ANDRE JAMES, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, NAIESHA JOHN, et al., Respondents, v. ANDREW CORWIN, M.D., et al., Defendants, and BEVERLY WOODARD et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 30, 2005.


Plaintiffs' expert's affirmation in opposition is properly based on evidentiary facts in the record, including defendant midwife's deposition testimony and defendant hospital's records, and satisfied plaintiffs' burden of showing the existence of issues of fact as to whether defendants departed from accepted standards of obstetrical care and, if so, thereby substantially contributed to the infant plaintiff's brain damage and other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases