Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the respondent's motion to consolidate the two actions, where, as here, both actions involve common questions of law and fact, and the appellants failed to demonstrate that prejudice to a substantial right would result from consolidation (see CPLR 602 [a]; Corporate Interiors v Pappas,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.