The hearing testimony established the requisite degree of prior familiarity to permit introduction of identification evidence despite the absence of timely statutory notice (see Family Ct Act § 330.2 [2]; CPL 710.30 [1] [b]). The victim had been introduced to appellant, had engaged in conversations with appellant, and knew appellant by her distinctive first name (see People v. Rodriguez,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
