JACOBS v. SABO


17 A.D.3d 321 (2005)

791 N.Y.S.2d 835

ROBERT JACOBS, Appellant, v. DAVID SABO, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 4, 2005.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A motion for leave to renew must be supported by new or additional facts which, although in existence at the time of the prior motion, were not known to the party seeking renewal, and, consequently, were not made known to the court (see Palmer v Toledo, 266 A.D.2d 268 [1999]). Here, the plaintiff failed to offer any new facts or a valid explanation as to why the medical report...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases