The motion court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to consolidate this Supreme Court action, which is not yet at the discovery stage, with a pending Civil Court summary proceeding that has already been placed on the trial calendar (see Barnes v Cathers & Dembrosky,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GOLDMAN v. ROSEN
15 A.D.3d 321 (2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 879
SHARON GOLDMAN, Respondent, v. ABY ROSEN, Appellant, et al., Counterclaim Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 24, 2005.
February 24, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.