The motion court correctly held that plaintiff fails to show an ownership interest in the stock allocated to the subject apartments that is superior to defendant's security interest therein pledged by her husband as sole owner, and that plaintiff is therefore not likely to succeed on the merits. Plaintiff also fails to show irreparable injury and a balancing of the equities in her favor (see W.T. Grant Co. v. Srogi,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
KALISCH v. MAPLE TRADE FINANCE CORPORATION
24 A.D.3d 308 (2005)
805 N.Y.S.2d 824
MAYRA DIAZ KALISCH, Appellant, v. MAPLE TRADE FINANCE CORPORATION, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 29, 2005.
December 29, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
