While it appears that defendant served a pro se motion for assignment of new counsel upon the People, the record does not establish that defendant ever filed that motion with the court. Even assuming that defendant filed the motion, he abandoned it by failing to call the court's attention to the fact that the motion remained unresolved, having had the opportunity to do so at the subsequent guilty plea and sentencing proceedings (see e.g. People v Brimage,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SANTOS
14 A.D.3d 316 (2005)
786 N.Y.S.2d 742
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANGEL SANTOS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 4, 2005.
January 4, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
