BRASSEUR v. SPERANZA


21 A.D.3d 297 (2005)

800 N.Y.S.2d 669

MICHEL BRASSEUR et al., Appellants, v. JOE SPERANZA et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

August 18, 2005.


Contrary to the view expressed by the motion court, the first and second causes of action would not have been properly asserted in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. Condominiums, generally regarded as unincorporated associations (Hunt v. Sharp, 85 N.Y.2d 883 [1995]), are not amenable to article 78 proceedings in the nature of mandamus for claims of bylaw breach (see Matter of Phalen v. Theatrical Protective Union No. 1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases