THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
BERNARD PITTS, Appellant.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v.
ANTHONY BARNWELL, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 6, 2005.
Decided February 15, 2005.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Edward J. Nowak, Public Defender, Rochester (James Eckert of counsel), for appellant in the first above-entitled action.
Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy A. Gilligan of counsel), for respondent in the first above-entitled action.
Edward J. Nowak, Public Defender, Rochester (James Eckert of counsel), for appellant in the second above-entitled action.
Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy A. Gilligan of counsel), for respondent in the second above-entitled action.
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO, READ and R.S. SMITH concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
OPINION OF THE COURT
G.B. SMITH, J.
These appeals present two questions: (1) does CPL 440.30 (1-a) impose a due diligence requirement, limiting the time by which a defendant must bring a postconviction motion requesting DNA testing and (2) does a defendant who brings such a motion bear the burden of establishing that the specified DNA evidence exists and is available in quantities sufficient to be tested?
...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.