The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury found that this plaintiff was negligent, but his negligence was not a proximate cause of the injury. The jury also determined that defendant violated Labor Law § 241 (6). There was evidence that although the injured plaintiff acted in a negligent manner, the accident would not have occurred if defendant had provided the proper safety equipment. It thus cannot be said that there was "no valid line of reasoning...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.