1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 26 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 26 Cal.Rptr.3d 274 (2005)
 

ENSLEN v. KENNEDY

No. G033186.

26 Cal.Rptr.3d 274 (2005)

Kevin M. ENSLEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Robert KENNEDY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Review Denied June 29, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rinos & Martin, Dimitrios C. Rinos, Santa Ana, and M. Christopher Hall for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Law Offices of La Follette, Johnson, De Haas, Fesler, Silberberg & Ames and Brian Meadows, Santa Ana, for Defendant and Respondent Charles Miles, D.C.

Carroll, Kelly, Trotter, Franzen & McKenna, David P. Pruett, Lori A. Conway, John C. Kelly, Long Beach, and Michael A. Killackey for Defendant and Respondent Robert Kennedy aka Mark Kennedy.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

I. INTRODUCTION

The precise issue in this appeal is whether a family practice physician is ipso facto unqualified to render an expert opinion to the effect that a chiropractor should have known the condition the chiropractor was treating was not amenable to chiropractic treatment. This is not really a "standard of care" case in the strictest sense. The question is not whether the proper chiropractic treatment was rendered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases