1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 24 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 24 Cal.Rptr.3d 275 (2005)
 

MORAN v. MURTAUGH, MILLER, MEYER & NELSON

No. G033102.

24 Cal.Rptr.3d 275 (2005)

Gene MORAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MURTAUGH, MILLER, MEYER & NELSON, LLP, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing March 2, 2005.

Review Granted May 18, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arik Shafir and Evan Blair for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Butz, Dunn, DeSantis & Bingham, Kevin V. DeSantis, Steven C. Uribe and Kathleen A. Silhasek, San Diego, for Defendants and Respondents.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

OPINION

ARONSON, J.

Gene Moran contends the trial court erred by requiring him, as a vexatious litigant, to post security before proceeding with claims against his former employer, Murtaugh, Miller, Meyer & Nelson, and several attorneys at the firm, Michael Nelson, Jim Murphy, David Davidson, and an administrator, Marjorie Doyle (collectively Murtaugh). Disagreeing with Devereaux...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases