1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 125 P.3d
  5. 125 P.3d 172 (2005)
 

OKESON v. CITY OF SEATTLE

No. 55104-3-I.

125 P.3d 172 (2005)

130 Wash.App. 814

Rud OKESON, Doris Burns, Walter L. Williams and Arthur T. Lane, individually and on behalf of the class of all persons similarly situated, Respondents, v. The CITY OF SEATTLE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

As Amended December 22, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Howard Patton, Foster, Pepper & Shefelman PLLC, Rebecca Cochran Earnest, Seattle City Attorneys Office, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

David Florian Jurca, Richard Stephen White, Jennifer Suzanne Divine, Helsell Fetterman LLP, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

Laurie K. Beale, Stoel Rives LLP, Seattle, WA, for Amicus Curiae (Americans for the Arts).

COLEMAN, J.

¶ 1 Seattle's Art in Public Works Construction ordinance, chapter 20.32 SMC, requires City Light and other city departments to allocate one percent of the budgets for their capital construction projects within Seattle for the support of public art. From 2000 to 2003, the City spent almost $3 million of City Light moneys on projects as varied as Salmon in the City, Urban Collaborations, Skagit Streaming, and the Wave Rave Cave. Rud Okeson and other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases