Based upon reports from an orthopedist and a neurologist diagnosing plaintiff with a resolved cervical and lumbar strain and full cervical and lumbar ranges of motion, defendants met their initial burden as summary judgment movants to demonstrate, prima facie, that plaintiff had not sustained serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Plaintiff did not meet her consequent burden (see Franchini v Palmieri,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SMITH v. BRITO
23 A.D.3d 273 (2005)
804 N.Y.S.2d 82
EVERENE SMITH, Appellant, v. BERMAN BRITO et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 17, 2005.
November 17, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.