The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of appellant's conduct before, during and after his companion's theft of a cell phone warranted the conclusion that appellant was an intentional participant in the theft, whose role was to distract a store employee (see Matter of Juan J.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.