1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 16 A.D.3d
  5. 16 A.D.3d 273 (2005)
 

ROUSE v. LEX REAL ASSOCIATES

16 A.D.3d 273 (2005)

792 N.Y.S.2d 38

GERALD ROUSE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LEX REAL ASSOCIATES et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 24, 2005.

There was no evidence that defendants created a dangerous condition or had actual or constructive notice of a hazard that could have been prevented by the exercise of reasonable care (see Garcia v Delgado Travel Agency, 4 A.D.3d 204 [2004]). The fact that rainwater was being tracked into the lobby does not constitute notice of a dangerous condition (id.). Having received no complaints of a wet spot near the floor mat, defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases