PER CURIAM.
Petitioner petitions for review of an order issued in 2000 by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision designating her a predatory sex offender (PSO). Petitioner raises two assignments of error. First, petitioner argues that the board did not provide her with notice and a hearing before designating her a PSO as required by Noble v. Board of Parole,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.