LAMAR CENTRAL OUTDOOR v. BD. OF ZONING APPEALS

No. 2001AP3105.

284 Wis.2d 1 (2005)

2005 WI 117

700 N.W.2d 87

LAMAR CENTRAL OUTDOOR, INC., d/b/a Lamar Advertising of Milwaukee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF the City of MILWAUKEE, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 12, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-respondent-petitioner there were briefs by Grant F. Langley, Stuart S. Mukamal, Milwaukee, and oral argument by Stuart S. Mukamal.

For the plaintiff-appellant there was a brief by Michael A.I. Whitcomb and Michael A.I. Whitcomb S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Michael A.I. Whitcomb.

An amicus curiae brief was filed by Catherine A. La Fleur and Halling & Cayo, S.C., Milwaukee, on behalf of the Outdoor Advertising Association of Wisconsin.

An amicus curiae brief was filed by Claire Silverman, Madison, on behalf of the League of Wisconsin Municipalities.


¶ 1. DAVID T. PROSSER, J.

This is a review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals, Lamar Central Outdoor, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals, No. 2001AP3105, unpublished order (Wis. Ct. App. June 17, 2003). In a summary disposition, the court of appeals held that the Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee (the Board) failed to reasonably exercise its discretion when it denied Lamar Central Outdoor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases