The court should have granted defendant's suppression motion. Defendant was in custody when he was asked why he had changed his shirt, in that a reasonable, innocent person in defendant's situation would not have felt free to leave (see Matter of Ricardo S.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DUNCAN
21 A.D.3d 252 (2005)
800 N.Y.S.2d 5
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KELLY DUNCAN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 4, 2005.
August 4, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.