PIERCE v. HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION (USA)


19 A.D.3d 244 (2005)

798 N.Y.S.2d 6

MICHAEL PIERCE, Appellant, v. HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION (USA) et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 21, 2005.


Plaintiff, a mortgage loan officer, contends that defendants violated the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) when, in terminating his employment while on FMLA leave, they denied him about $400,000 in commissions for loans he had negotiated which had been approved but had not yet closed. To properly state an actionable denial of benefits under FMLA, a claimant must show an employment relationship, entitlement to take leave...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases