1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 117 P.3d
  5. 117 P.3d 146 (2005)
 

STATE v. BIGHAM

No. 30631.

117 P.3d 146 (2005)

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jay BIGHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

July 11, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Eric D. Fredericksen, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Robert K. Schwarz, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

LANSING, Judge.

Jay Bigham appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Bigham contends that the evidence was discovered as the result of an unlawful detention. We conclude that even if police misconduct occurred, application of the attenuation doctrine makes suppression of evidence inappropriate, and we therefore affirm the district court's order.

I.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases