1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 161 Ohio
  5. 161 Ohio App.3d 99 (2005)
 

STATE v. NEELY

No. C-030755.

161 Ohio App.3d 99 (2005)

2005-Ohio-2342

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. NEELY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County.

Decided May 13, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chris McEvilley, for appellant.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and James M. Keeling, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

MARK P. PAINTER, Judge.

{¶ 1} When suspects invoke their right to counsel, even if in custody, but later make statements while again in custody, does the original invocation continue forever, thus making later custodial statements inadmissible? This question has not, as far as we can tell, been answered in Ohio. We answer no. Even if a suspect, once in custody, invokes the right to counsel, if there is a break in custody for a reasonable time, then...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases