1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 37 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 37 Cal.Rptr.3d 221 (2005)
 

AJAXO INC. v. E*TRADE GROUP, INC.

Nos. H026757, H027383.

37 Cal.Rptr.3d 221 (2005)

135 Cal.App.4th 21

AJAXO INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. E*TRADE GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

December 21, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley and Susan H. Handelman, Redwood City, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Steefel, Levitt & Weiss and Michael J. Lawson, Mark Fogelman, Joseph E. Floren, Brian T. Hafter, San Francisco and Rebecca M. Hoberg, for Defendant and Appellant E*Trade Group, Inc.

Pillsbury Winthrop and William F. Abrams, Palo Alto, Kevin M. Fong, San Francisco and Jason McDonell, for Defendant and Appellant Everypath, Inc.

ELIA, J.

Introduction

Following a seven-week trial, on April 22, 2003, a jury found that E*Trade Group Inc. (E*Trade) had breached a mutual non-disclosure agreement it had with Ajaxo Inc. (Ajaxo) by disclosing protected information to Everypath Inc. (Everypath).1 The jury assessed $1.29 million in damages against E*Trade for breach of the non-disclosure agreement.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases