1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 118 P.3d
  5. 118 P.3d 136 (2005)
 

KARLE v. VISSER

No. 30666.

118 P.3d 136 (2005)

Charles F. KARLE and Valerie A. Karle, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Third Party Defendants-Respondents, v. Doug VISSER and Vicki Visser, husband and wife, Defendants, and Arthur M. Bistline, Third Party Claimant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, April 2005 Term.

July 22, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur M. Bistline, Coeur d'Alene, for appellant.

Janet E. Jenkins, Sandpoint for respondents.

SCHROEDER, Chief Justice.

This case involves an appeal from a district court decision that Arthur M. Bistline (Bistline) did not have a valid security interest in a pending action to collect on a promissory note.

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BANKGROUND

On June 9, 1994, Doug and Vicki Visser (the Vissers) entered into an agreement to sell their dismantling and auto salvage business to Charles and Valerie Karle (the Karles) for the sum of $85...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases