FRAME v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

No. A106383.

36 Cal.Rptr.3d 209 (2005)

Tom FRAME, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

November 28, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome B. Falk, Jr., Steven L. Mayer, Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, San Francisco, John J. Bartko, Christopher J. Hunt, Allan N. Littman, Bartko, Zankel, Tarrant & Miller, San Francisco, for Plaintiffs and Appellant.

Daniel M. Kolkey, Scott A. Fink, Daniel P. Muino, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent.


Certified for Partial Publication.*

STEVENS, Acting P.J.

Appellants Tom Frame, Bruce Miller, and Ronald G. VandenBerghe (for themselves and as representatives of a class) and Six Sigma LLC (by its trustee in bankruptcy), maintain the trial court erred in granting respondent PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) summary judgment on claims based on theories of conspiracy, aiding and abetting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases