The record, which shows that respondent solicited significant amounts from petitioners, New York investors, communicated by telephone and mail with them in New York, and visited New York on several occasions to discuss the business of the parties' joint venture, supports a finding that respondent's contacts with New York were sufficient to confer jurisdiction under CPLR 302 (a) (1) (see Fabrikant & Sons v Adrianne Kahn, Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
L&R EXPLORATION VENTURE v. GRYNBERG
22 A.D.3d 221 (2005)
804 N.Y.S.2d 286
L&R EXPLORATION VENTURE et al., Respondents, v. JACK J. GRYNBERG, Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 4, 2005.
October 4, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
