1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 35 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 206 (2005)
 

HALL v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. B184247.

35 Cal.Rptr.3d 206 (2005)

133 Cal.App.4th 908

Panchita HALL, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; The People, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

October 26, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael P. Judge, Public Defender, Albert J. Menaster, Philip Dube and Mark G. Harvis, Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner.

Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin, Steven L. Mayer and Keith D. Kessler, San Francisco, for Respondent.

No appearance by Real Party in Interest.

JOHNSON, J.

Panchita Hall seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent superior court to permit her to file her Pitchess1 motion and to rule on the merits of her motion. She claims the criminal division of the South Central District of the Los Angeles County Superior Court enforces an invalid local rule requiring all pretrial motions, regardless of nature or type, be both filed and heard 30 days before trial, and for this reason...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases